A guide or course on using AI for creative/technical brainstorming and transparent communication.

Published on 06/14/2025Product Idea Validation (Non-SaaS)

Product Suggestion: An online course or comprehensive ebook titled "AI-Assisted Inquiry: Navigating LLMs for Exploration, Research, and Communication."

Key Content Modules/Topics:

  1. Foundations: Grasping AI (like ChatGPT) as a supportive tool, not an infallible oracle; setting realistic expectations, understanding its capabilities, and recognizing its limitations.
  2. Effective Prompt Engineering: Techniques for crafting prompts that facilitate deep exploration, idea generation, and critical analysis (e.g., asking AI to play devil's advocate or identify weaknesses in an argument), and structuring complex information.
  3. Critical Evaluation of AI Output: Methods for fact-checking, identifying potential biases in AI responses, and ensuring the user maintains intellectual ownership and accuracy by critically engaging with and verifying AI-generated content.
  4. Integration and Synthesis: Strategies for weaving AI-generated ideas or text into one's own work authentically, ensuring the final output reflects the user's voice and understanding, rather than mere copy-pasting.
  5. Transparent Communication of AI Use: Best practices for disclosing the use of AI tools in research and communication. This includes when, how, and to what extent AI assistance should be acknowledged to build trust, maintain credibility (e.g., sharing prompt strategies or methodology as suggested by commenters), and foster constructive dialogue rather than suspicion. This module would directly address how to handle accusations of being a "bot" or lacking original thought.
  6. Case Studies and Practical Application: Analyzing real-world examples (like the Reddit thread itself, anonymized) of successful and unsuccessful AI-assisted communication to highlight best practices and common pitfalls.

Target Audience: This product targets a growing audience of hobbyists, students, creatives, amateur researchers, and professionals who are using new AI tools but lack the established methodology to do so effectively, ethically, and transparently, especially when sharing their AI-assisted work with others.

Expected Benefits for Users:

  • Enhanced ability to leverage AI for productive brainstorming and in-depth research.
  • Skills to critically assess and responsibly integrate AI-generated content.
  • Clear guidelines on ethical AI use and transparent disclosure, leading to increased credibility.
  • Confidence to engage in public or academic discussions involving AI-assisted work without facing undue skepticism or accusations of inauthenticity.
  • Overall improvement in the quality and reception of their AI-assisted projects.

Potential Revenue Streams:

  • Direct sales of the online course or ebook.
  • Tiered access with additional resources like templates, checklists, or a private community.
  • Workshops for specific interest groups or organizations looking to upskill their members/employees.

Origin Reddit Post

r/lightbulb

What if an atom could heal itself? I’ve theorized a regenerative element called “Swardium”

Posted by u/Real_Kranky06/14/2025
I’ve always had random science thoughts, but never acted on them—mostly because I’m not a physicist or engineer. Just a 28-year-old from Queensland, Australia who can't stop thinking about “w

Top Comments

u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/buyingthething
is this the same guy from a few weeks ago? New account is seems. if so, they're going to talk about nothing but "this topic" for the next month, on every subreddit they can find. LITERALLY
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/buyingthething
why not INCLUDE the terms you are feeding into the AI to generate your responses. so people can understand what you want to say.
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
Hey — thanks for the thoughtful reply, and I really appreciate the honesty. You’re absolutely right: science is rooted in observation and evidence, not imagination alone. I’m not a physicist
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/Epiphany818
Heya, I also can't read the link cause it's broken but I'm slightly confused about what this proposal is. When people talk about new elements what they usually mean is they've "discovered" a
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/Real_Kranky
Hey, thanks for the great question — and fair call about the link! Here's a working Dropbox version of the full theory PDF while Zenodo is still in review: 🔗 [Swardium Master Theory](https:
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/GreyFoxSolid
ChatGPT.
u/Real_Kranky
Let me know what parts sound plausible vs impossible — I’m here to learn and improve this.
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Real_Kranky
Yeah, I’ve used ChatGPT — and I’m not hiding that. The core idea, questions, and theory structure are all mine. I used ChatGPT to help organize my thoughts, format the writing clearly, gener
u/Epiphany818
Sorry I think you need to make the drop box file public 😭🤣 sharing files sucks lol why is it always so difficult. Anyway, I think the biggest problem you're going to run into with this is t
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/Crafty_Jello_3662
Wouldn't reversing nuclear decay be the same as fusion?
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/GreyFoxSolid
I don't believe you since you're using it to do everything, even respond.
u/Real_Kranky
I'm sorry im not very smart so it is helping me in many ways while it is doing a lot im the one giving it the ideas and was just getting the conversation out there, you dont have to believe m
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/GreyFoxSolid
Now ask ChatGPT to disprove your idea.
u/dustractor
> I’m not a physicist or engineer. That part sounds plausible.
u/buyingthething
> — you're a bot
u/Real_Kranky
I get where you're coming from — but I'm not looking for ChatGPT to disprove or validate anything. I’m using it like a **research assistant**, not a final authority. This isn’t about proving
u/tsetdeeps
Hm. Yeah. Look, it's nice you're interested in science and stuff. But if all you're doing is copy/pasting comments into ChatGPT and then copy/pasting what ChatGPT told you... the whole conver
u/tsetdeeps
Hey. The link is dead, unfortunately. That being said. Yeah. Let's talk science. Long story short: to make models and stuff you have to base them off on actual observations. I mean, you can
u/Real_Kranky
Great question — and honestly, that’s exactly the kind of comparison I was hoping people would explore. You're right that **reversing decay** sounds superficially similar to **nuclear fusion
u/papadooku
Great talking with you Chat

Ask AI About This

Get deeper insights about this topic from our AI assistant

Start Chat

Create Your Own

Generate custom insights for your specific needs

Get Started