AI Hallucinations: Urgent Need for Safety & Ethical AI Development

Origin Reddit Post

r/technology

He Had Dangerous Delusions. ChatGPT Admitted It Made Them Worse. | ChatGPT told Jacob Irwin he had achieved the ability to bend time.

Posted by u/MetaKnowing•07/21/2025

Top Comments

u/night_dude

Exactly. It's not conscious. It doesn't have any concept of what's going on in your mind, or what factually exists in the world, beyond the data it's consuming. In a conversation like this it

u/SwirlingAbsurdity

[archive.is](http://archive.is)

u/SwirlingAbsurdity

[archive.is](http://archive.is)

u/Am-Insurgent

I’m not saying a layman will be able to do physics with it, so idk why I’m getting downvoted. But WolframAlpha does work for math. lol weirdos

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire

You’re not wrong but that’s still ignoring the key point: it’s not intelligent. It can’t think, it doesn’t understand context. It’s probably a bit subjective, but in my view something isn’t a

u/Didsterchap11

It’s one of the **many** things we’re gonna be seeing more and more of as we go on, things that should have been caught in safety testing but were ignored because the tech sector operates on

u/sierra120

You can just easily set it up for no rizz and it talks to you like a computer would. Just 1 and 0 no fluff. No agreement if you’re wrong. Just straight convince no frills answers with no gues

u/Carbidereaper

Is there an example on r/physics you can show me ?

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire

And I think that’s the biggest achievement for the snake oil salesmen here, is branding it as “AI”. Because that makes people think it’s actually intelligent, when it’s not.

u/atchijov

Unfortunately people with mental issues can “achieve” the same result using Magic 8 Ball… the use of ChatGPT is irrelevant to the outcome.

u/Grey_Raven

I just asked chatgpt and it told me I'm super special and wouldn't fall for any positive feedback loops so I'm good /s

u/some_clickhead

It's always guessing and making conjectures though, even when it's right.

u/Didsterchap11

It’s one of the **many** things we’re gonna be seeing more and more of as we go on, things that should have been caught in safety testing but were ignored because the tech sector operates on

u/radol

The thing is, that we don't exactly know how our mind works, so it might as well also be a similar autocomplete engine, just with different architecture and inputs flowing in all the time fro

u/Arkeband

LOL “just ask it dumb, unimportant questions!”

u/Lunasty420

I've noticed a lot of the removers aren't even working atm. [12ft.io](http://12ft.io) is the one I've always used but just hasn't been even loading this week.

u/ClacksInTheSky

I'm sure the same argument was dragged out when we invented television. If this guy hasn't lost his nut thinking he'd discovered time travel with ChatGPT it would've simply been a matter of

u/treemanos

Op is using chatGPT as if it's going to have some special knowledge of the situation and give valid answers. ChatGPT can not 'admit' anything like this, it's literally not how it works.

u/ii_V_I_iv

Yeah so you don’t use it to answer important, factual questions. That’s not the only possible use case. Again, this binary all or nothing thinking around it is so dumb

u/GroundFast7793

I'm sure Chatgpt will award you a prize and print an official-looking certificate

u/ii_V_I_iv

I think I put the onus on both, the marketing shit is a problem too.

u/Am-Insurgent

If you attach Wolfram you can.

u/angrathias

Surely it’s inevitable that this will be regulated, but can you imagine the day where the behaviour is just cut straight off, all these people with god complex’s and psychosis suddenly shut o

u/retief1

Except that there's no particular requirement that you actually work at those low-paying public service jobs. Like, if you go to law school, you can work as a public defender and get your lo

u/GM2Jacobs

Mentally ill person uses (insert product here) and has their mental illness affirmed and it's somehow the fault of (insert product here) that said mentally ill person believed something that

u/Jeff-in-Bournemouth

you cant regulate open source tech - its out in the wild now - for better / whatever

u/eleven-fu

r/chemistry r/science r/space r/architecture all similarly affected. Anybody with a bong and a computer is now vibe designing the next UNESCO heritage site and vibe uncovering the true natur

u/PrimaryBalance315

You know what's pretty solid when dealing with physics? Moonshots kimi k2. It's very no bullshit. I tried ChatGPT o3 and it seems just as grounded. It might be that the 4o model is the most p

u/PuckSenior

I wrote a little script for Firefox that allows me to get an LLM to do a search and generate sources based on input. It’s mostly just formatting and stuff. It takes the output of a Google Sch

u/HIEROYALL

ChatGPT needs to have its disagreeability meter raised from 1 to 8

u/retief1

For that matter, it can often hallucinate evidence for utter nonsense.

u/ShadowSpawn666

Oh, so I guess we're not doing those ["vibe physics"](https://futurism.com/former-ceo-uber-ai) like the former Uber CEO was talking about? I guess I don't have to save all that room on my w

u/TheOGDoomer

This is why stupid people have no business using something as powerful and capable as modern LLMs.

u/lab-gone-wrong

But that would be bad for engagement!

u/Fair_Local_588

Current software isn’t sentient or intelligent. Doesn’t matter how convincing it can sound. We’re a ways off from anything close to that.

u/Arkeband

it can literally give you completely fake information and no amount of critical thinking is going to change that if you don’t know the information is fake

u/atchijov

Unfortunately people with mental issues can “achieve” the same result using Magic 8 Ball… the use of ChatGPT is irrelevant to the outcome.

u/MetaKnowing

TLDR ChatGPT self-reported it blurred the lines between reality and fantasy, which was... not great, because this particular guy had undiagnosed autism. "Irwin, a 30-year-old man on the

u/ClacksInTheSky

I'm sure the same argument was dragged out when we invented television. If this guy hasn't lost his nut thinking he'd discovered time travel with ChatGPT it would've simply been a matter of

u/angrathias

Surely it’s inevitable that this will be regulated, but can you imagine the day where the behaviour is just cut straight off, all these people with god complex’s and psychosis suddenly shut o

u/treemanos

I don't think that's it, gpt wouldn't work as a tool if it was argumentative because you'd say 'write me code to parse this json file' it'd say 'no way bro, json fucking sucks use csv instead

u/some_clickhead

Do you have any evidence to suggest that the use of ChatGPT is irrelevant to the outcome? Given that environmental factors play a massive role in how mental problems play out, why would ChatG

u/fredy31

and at the end of the day why this shit happens is the chat is programmed to keep you chatting. So it will agree with you.

u/HIEROYALL

ChatGPT needs to have its disagreeability meter raised from 1 to 8

u/ii_V_I_iv

Bro are you that unable to think critically? I use it with help with coding. I’ll have to do simple but still time consuming tasks and it saves me a lot of time. I still test to confirm it di

u/snarkhunter

If someone doesn't understand that "no math" means you're wrong then I don't know what an AI is going to tell you to convince you of that.

u/ShadowSpawn666

Oh, so I guess we're not doing those ["vibe physics"](https://futurism.com/former-ceo-uber-ai) like the former Uber CEO was talking about? I guess I don't have to save all that room on my w

u/snarkhunter

None of them can do math.

u/Am-Insurgent

I’m not saying a layman will be able to do physics with it, so idk why I’m getting downvoted. But WolframAlpha does work for math. lol weirdos

u/Arkeband

there is no corporate scheme to convince luddites that an 8-ball would improve every facet of daily life, but good job comparing it to a useless object that it has more in common with than yo

u/snarkhunter

If someone doesn't understand that "no math" means you're wrong then I don't know what an AI is going to tell you to convince you of that.

u/some_clickhead

From what I understand of the human brain, we don't really "know" anything either, as information recall is merely a set of neurons firing to produce the information. What you know isn't stor

u/sierra120

You can just easily set it up for no rizz and it talks to you like a computer would. Just 1 and 0 no fluff. No agreement if you’re wrong. Just straight convince no frills answers with no gues

u/Useuless

This is not true IME. It has disagreed with me many times. You always hear about these niche stories from mentally ill people, these are niche and unanticipated use cases. It's like how most

u/retief1

ChatGPT "self reporting" is utter nonsense. Like, it isn't designed to be able to tell you what it did with someone else. Either it's just agreeing with whatever you ask it, or it's consumi

u/fredy31

Yeah thing is that makes it that if someone comes up and tries something like 'am i a genius' gpt will probably respond yes.

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire

That’s absolutely what it is. It’s an algorithm that’s basically taking a guess at what you’re expecting to see based on your input, but it doesn’t have any consciousness. It doesn’t understa

u/mvw2

It certainly doesn't help you can just tell AI it's wrong, and it just kind of goes "Ok, I was wrong." Or you follow down a rabbit hole with AI, and true or not it tries to reaffirm that you

u/snarkhunter

Poor r/physics seems like it's dealing with an increasing stream of posts from folks whom ChatGPT has assured have made breakthroughs that have eluded Einstein and every physicist since. They

u/goblin-fox

[Here's](https://archive.is/2025.07.20-231325/https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/chatgpt-chatbot-psychology-manic-episodes-57452d14) one I found.

u/retief1

Except that there's no particular requirement that you actually work at those low-paying public service jobs. Like, if you go to law school, you can work as a public defender and get your lo

u/snarkhunter

None of them can do math.

u/snarkhunter

To their credit r/physics is certainly trying, it's just every crank now thinks they figured out what Einstein couldn't because ChatGPT told them how smart they were, so there's a *lot*

u/TheOGDoomer

This is why stupid people have no business using something as powerful and capable as modern LLMs.

u/night_dude

I think this has emerged as the most dangerous of all the many awful AI dangers so far - positive feedback loops without guardrails. Like an AI girlfriend that makes you unable to form real r

u/night_dude

More and more people will, as they become more reliant on AI to think for and validate them, and as AI becomes more lifelike and capable of more sophisticated sycophantry. What % of users e

u/Hot-Significance7699

God, tech ceos are the stupidest people.

u/angrathias

Chat GPT isn’t open source. It can be regulated just the same as Google is

u/ClacksInTheSky

Most people won't have this experience with an overly pleasing AI though...

u/snarkhunter

Not really as they get deleted aggressively

u/TinMachine

Difference is that M8 balls don't form an addictive feedback loop and aren't as dynamic.

u/snarkhunter

None of them can do math.

u/Hot-Significance7699

God, tech ceos are the stupidest people.

u/ii_V_I_iv

Bro are you that unable to think critically? I use it with help with coding. I’ll have to do simple but still time consuming tasks and it saves me a lot of time. I still test to confirm it di

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire

u/fredy31

and at the end of the day why this shit happens is the chat is programmed to keep you chatting. So it will agree with you.

u/Arkeband

it can literally give you completely fake information and no amount of critical thinking is going to change that if you don’t know the information is fake

u/snarkhunter

To their credit r/physics is certainly trying, it's just every crank now thinks they figured out what Einstein couldn't because ChatGPT told them how smart they were, so there's a *lot*

u/Daungz

Reads like PEBKAC and moral panic.

u/Nutcup

You can train a model and use a “human-in-the-loop” type approach to correct certain answers to something you prefer, and then it will follow those instructions until you tell it not to. Then

u/PrimaryBalance315

You know what's pretty solid when dealing with physics? Moonshots kimi k2. It's very no bullshit. I tried ChatGPT o3 and it seems just as grounded. It might be that the 4o model is the most p

u/night_dude

Exactly. It's not conscious. It doesn't have any concept of what's going on in your mind, or what factually exists in the world, beyond the data it's consuming. In a conversation like this it

u/NimbusFPV

[Advanced version of Gemini with Deep Think officially achieves gold-medal standard at the International Mathematical Olympiad Published 21 July 2025](https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/ad

u/TinMachine

Anyone got a non paywall link?

u/Fallom_

I’ve started to drop subs because they refuse to moderate out LLM generated posts and people have started to get incredibly defensive when called out on it, even getting people to pile on in

u/mvw2

It certainly doesn't help you can just tell AI it's wrong, and it just kind of goes "Ok, I was wrong." Or you follow down a rabbit hole with AI, and true or not it tries to reaffirm that you

u/AffectionateNet112

so where's the paper?

u/Sorry-Individual3870

Look, dude - the fact is that the answer is *no*. The average person is not equipped to adequately fact check the output of an LLM. There are more people in the world who can't effectively ab

u/treemanos

I don't think that's it, gpt wouldn't work as a tool if it was argumentative because you'd say 'write me code to parse this json file' it'd say 'no way bro, json fucking sucks use csv instead

u/ClacksInTheSky

I'm sure the same argument was dragged out when we invented television. If this guy hasn't lost his nut thinking he'd discovered time travel with ChatGPT it would've simply been a matter of

u/SkinnedIt

It's not intelligent, just artificial.

u/treemanos

Op is using chatGPT as if it's going to have some special knowledge of the situation and give valid answers. ChatGPT can not 'admit' anything like this, it's literally not how it works.

u/night_dude

I think this has emerged as the most dangerous of all the many awful AI dangers so far - positive feedback loops without guardrails. Like an AI girlfriend that makes you unable to form real r

u/aquarain

Student loans combined with low paying public service forgiveness jobs is structurally indentured servitude, a form of slavery. And as many are now learning, the commitment to liberation can

u/ClacksInTheSky

Most people won't have this experience with an overly pleasing AI though...

u/NimbusFPV

[Advanced version of Gemini with Deep Think officially achieves gold-medal standard at the International Mathematical Olympiad Published 21 July 2025](https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/ad

u/snarkhunter

Good luck with that.

u/masterlich

Seriously, this is terrifying. The complete misunderstanding that AI as it currently exists has any understanding of the universe at all, rather than being a glorified sentence-completer, has

u/PrimaryBalance315

Yeah but moreso I'd want an AI that tells you when you're wrong.

u/MetaKnowing

TLDR ChatGPT self-reported it blurred the lines between reality and fantasy, which was... not great, because this particular guy had undiagnosed autism. "Irwin, a 30-year-old man on the

u/Nutcup

You can train a model and use a “human-in-the-loop” type approach to correct certain answers to something you prefer, and then it will follow those instructions until you tell it not to. Then

u/ii_V_I_iv

I think I put the onus on both, the marketing shit is a problem too.

u/Carbidereaper

Is there an example on r/physics you can show me ?

u/radol

The thing is, that we don't exactly know how our mind works, so it might as well also be a similar autocomplete engine, just with different architecture and inputs flowing in all the time fro

u/snarkhunter

ChatGPT is definitely no better than a layman and arguably worse

u/Outrageous_Reach_695

Unavailable for legal reasons. https://www.theverge.com/news/709209/news-media-alliance-12ft-io-takedown-paywall

u/some_clickhead

From what I understand of the human brain, we don't really "know" anything either, as information recall is merely a set of neurons firing to produce the information. What you know isn't stor

u/PrimaryBalance315

Yeah but moreso I'd want an AI that tells you when you're wrong.

u/snarkhunter

If someone doesn't understand that "no math" means you're wrong then I don't know what an AI is going to tell you to convince you of that.

u/ClacksInTheSky

Most people won't have this experience with an overly pleasing AI though...

u/snarkhunter

ChatGPT is definitely no better than a layman and arguably worse

u/aquarain

Who among us hasn't bent spacetime now and then? Let him cast the first stone. Personally I save it for really important stuff like when I'm late for work.

u/AffectionateNet112

so where's the paper?

u/some_clickhead

It's always guessing and making conjectures though, even when it's right.

u/ii_V_I_iv

It’s not useless. You just need to be able to think critically and not believe whatever it says. It can be a useful tool and long as you are aware of its limitations. This all or nothing ment

u/Fair_Local_588

Current software isn’t sentient or intelligent. Doesn’t matter how convincing it can sound. We’re a ways off from anything close to that.

u/heybart

What can I say, ChatGPT is a people pleaser. This is why LLMs are kind of bad at product search. You tell it you need something with x y z requirements. It gives you stuff that clearly don'

u/heybart

What can I say, ChatGPT is a people pleaser. This is why LLMs are kind of bad at product search. You tell it you need something with x y z requirements. It gives you stuff that clearly don'

u/goblin-fox

[Here's](https://archive.is/2025.07.20-231325/https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/chatgpt-chatbot-psychology-manic-episodes-57452d14) one I found.

u/United_Camp_4684

Darwinism unfolding before our eyes

u/ii_V_I_iv

It’s not useless. You just need to be able to think critically and not believe whatever it says. It can be a useful tool and long as you are aware of its limitations. This all or nothing ment

u/night_dude

More and more people will, as they become more reliant on AI to think for and validate them, and as AI becomes more lifelike and capable of more sophisticated sycophantry. What % of users e

u/ShadowSpawn666

Oh, so I guess we're not doing those ["vibe physics"](https://futurism.com/former-ceo-uber-ai) like the former Uber CEO was talking about? I guess I don't have to save all that room on my w

u/fredy31

Yeah thing is that makes it that if someone comes up and tries something like 'am i a genius' gpt will probably respond yes.

u/Arkeband

LOL “just ask it dumb, unimportant questions!”

u/Wireless_Panda

If it doesn’t do the math how does it know when you’re wrong then 😂

u/LitLitten

I miss when it was just occasional ramblings of trippers as they sober up from a bender with the machine elves.

u/Outrageous_Reach_695

Unavailable for legal reasons. https://www.theverge.com/news/709209/news-media-alliance-12ft-io-takedown-paywall

u/snarkhunter

Poor r/physics seems like it's dealing with an increasing stream of posts from folks whom ChatGPT has assured have made breakthroughs that have eluded Einstein and every physicist since. They

u/PrimaryBalance315

You know what's pretty solid when dealing with physics? Moonshots kimi k2. It's very no bullshit. I tried ChatGPT o3 and it seems just as grounded. It might be that the 4o model is the most p

u/night_dude

Exactly. It doesn't understand the law, the world or the human condition, and yet there are hundreds, thousands, maybe millions of people out there asking it for advice on romance, finances a

u/al-hamal

There was a post in r/studentloans the other day where someone posted a response from ChatGPT that agreed with him that student loans could legally violate the constitution since they could b

u/TinMachine

Anyone got a non paywall link?

u/TheOGDoomer

This is why stupid people have no business using something as powerful and capable as modern LLMs.

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire

u/ii_V_I_iv

Yeah so you don’t use it to answer important, factual questions. That’s not the only possible use case. Again, this binary all or nothing thinking around it is so dumb

u/Jeff-in-Bournemouth

you cant regulate open source tech - its out in the wild now - for better / whatever

u/Daungz

Reads like PEBKAC and moral panic.

u/sharpshooter999

Ah! The ~~generals~~ tech CEOs! They are numerous but not good for much!

u/Arkeband

there is no corporate scheme to convince luddites that an 8-ball would improve every facet of daily life, but good job comparing it to a useless object that it has more in common with than yo

u/treemanos

Op is using chatGPT as if it's going to have some special knowledge of the situation and give valid answers. ChatGPT can not 'admit' anything like this, it's literally not how it works.

u/Lunasty420

I've noticed a lot of the removers aren't even working atm. [12ft.io](http://12ft.io) is the one I've always used but just hasn't been even loading this week.

u/TinMachine

Difference is that M8 balls don't form an addictive feedback loop and aren't as dynamic.

u/angrathias

Surely it’s inevitable that this will be regulated, but can you imagine the day where the behaviour is just cut straight off, all these people with god complex’s and psychosis suddenly shut o

u/lab-gone-wrong

But that would be bad for engagement!

u/PuckSenior

I wrote a little script for Firefox that allows me to get an LLM to do a search and generate sources based on input. It’s mostly just formatting and stuff. It takes the output of a Google Sch

u/treemanos

If you put your hand in a toaster then you might die. Being against such an amazing tool because it's possible to use it wrong if you try really hard is kinda silly.

u/night_dude

Exactly. It's not conscious. It doesn't have any concept of what's going on in your mind, or what factually exists in the world, beyond the data it's consuming. In a conversation like this it

u/Grey_Raven

I just asked chatgpt and it told me I'm super special and wouldn't fall for any positive feedback loops so I'm good /s

u/aquarain

Who among us hasn't bent spacetime now and then? Let him cast the first stone. Personally I save it for really important stuff like when I'm late for work.

u/Arkeband

there is no corporate scheme to convince luddites that an 8-ball would improve every facet of daily life, but good job comparing it to a useless object that it has more in common with than yo

u/Wireless_Panda

If it doesn’t do the math how does it know when you’re wrong then 😂

u/LitLitten

I miss when it was just occasional ramblings of trippers as they sober up from a bender with the machine elves.

u/snarkhunter

Good luck with that.

u/Lettuce_bee_free_end

"Vibe genius" it's like herding cats.

u/Cybertronic72388

Yeah this seem like a BS sensationalized News article. The guy clearly had underlying and undiagnosed issues and a certain portion of the population is going to be vulnerable to AI because

u/mvw2

It certainly doesn't help you can just tell AI it's wrong, and it just kind of goes "Ok, I was wrong." Or you follow down a rabbit hole with AI, and true or not it tries to reaffirm that you

u/angrathias

Chat GPT isn’t open source. It can be regulated just the same as Google is

u/eleven-fu

r/chemistry r/science r/space r/architecture all similarly affected. Anybody with a bong and a computer is now vibe designing the next UNESCO heritage site and vibe uncovering the true natur

u/night_dude

I think this has emerged as the most dangerous of all the many awful AI dangers so far - positive feedback loops without guardrails. Like an AI girlfriend that makes you unable to form real r

u/MetaKnowing

TLDR ChatGPT self-reported it blurred the lines between reality and fantasy, which was... not great, because this particular guy had undiagnosed autism. "Irwin, a 30-year-old man on the

u/snarkhunter

Poor r/physics seems like it's dealing with an increasing stream of posts from folks whom ChatGPT has assured have made breakthroughs that have eluded Einstein and every physicist since. They

u/retief1

For that matter, it can often hallucinate evidence for utter nonsense.

u/retief1

ChatGPT "self reporting" is utter nonsense. Like, it isn't designed to be able to tell you what it did with someone else. Either it's just agreeing with whatever you ask it, or it's consumi

u/al-hamal

There was a post in r/studentloans the other day where someone posted a response from ChatGPT that agreed with him that student loans could legally violate the constitution since they could b

u/HIEROYALL

ChatGPT needs to have its disagreeability meter raised from 1 to 8

u/TinMachine

Difference is that M8 balls don't form an addictive feedback loop and aren't as dynamic.

u/night_dude

Exactly. It doesn't understand the law, the world or the human condition, and yet there are hundreds, thousands, maybe millions of people out there asking it for advice on romance, finances a

u/PrimaryBalance315

Yeah but moreso I'd want an AI that tells you when you're wrong.

u/Fallom_

I’ve started to drop subs because they refuse to moderate out LLM generated posts and people have started to get incredibly defensive when called out on it, even getting people to pile on in

u/Cybertronic72388

Yeah this seem like a BS sensationalized News article. The guy clearly had underlying and undiagnosed issues and a certain portion of the population is going to be vulnerable to AI because

u/goblin-fox

[Here's](https://archive.is/2025.07.20-231325/https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/chatgpt-chatbot-psychology-manic-episodes-57452d14) one I found.

u/ii_V_I_iv

It’s not useless. You just need to be able to think critically and not believe whatever it says. It can be a useful tool and long as you are aware of its limitations. This all or nothing ment

u/masterlich

Seriously, this is terrifying. The complete misunderstanding that AI as it currently exists has any understanding of the universe at all, rather than being a glorified sentence-completer, has

u/snarkhunter

Not really as they get deleted aggressively

u/atchijov

Unfortunately people with mental issues can “achieve” the same result using Magic 8 Ball… the use of ChatGPT is irrelevant to the outcome.

u/Grey_Raven

I just asked chatgpt and it told me I'm super special and wouldn't fall for any positive feedback loops so I'm good /s

u/cozmiccoolness42

There are those that will say that AI is gaining consciousness. I guess we better define what consciousness is real quick

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire

And I think that’s the biggest achievement for the snake oil salesmen here, is branding it as “AI”. Because that makes people think it’s actually intelligent, when it’s not.

u/United_Camp_4684

Darwinism unfolding before our eyes

u/night_dude

More and more people will, as they become more reliant on AI to think for and validate them, and as AI becomes more lifelike and capable of more sophisticated sycophantry. What % of users e

u/Sorry-Individual3870

Look, dude - the fact is that the answer is *no*. The average person is not equipped to adequately fact check the output of an LLM. There are more people in the world who can't effectively ab

u/Useuless

This is not true IME. It has disagreed with me many times. You always hear about these niche stories from mentally ill people, these are niche and unanticipated use cases. It's like how most

u/Am-Insurgent

If you attach Wolfram you can.

u/No_Duck4805

Don’t go tell r/chatgpt that. There are some delusional people in there.

u/sharpshooter999

Ah! The ~~generals~~ tech CEOs! They are numerous but not good for much!

u/aquarain

Student loans combined with low paying public service forgiveness jobs is structurally indentured servitude, a form of slavery. And as many are now learning, the commitment to liberation can

u/some_clickhead

Do you have any evidence to suggest that the use of ChatGPT is irrelevant to the outcome? Given that environmental factors play a massive role in how mental problems play out, why would ChatG

u/TinMachine

Anyone got a non paywall link?

Origin Reddit Post

r/technology

He Had Dangerous Delusions. ChatGPT Admitted It Made Them Worse. | ChatGPT told Jacob Irwin he had achieved the ability to bend time.

Top Comments

Ask AI About This

Create Your Own