Consumer scrutiny on Terms of Service reveals demand for transparency and privacy solutions.
The evaluation of 'Terms of Service' (ToS) and the criticism of companies like Nintendo highlight a growing public awareness and demand for corporate transparency, data privacy, and user-friendly legal agreements. This presents opportunities for legal tech companies developing tools to simplify ToS, consumer advocacy platforms rating corporate policies, consulting services advising businesses on ethical data practices, and privacy-focused services empowering users to better manage their digital rights.
Origin Reddit Post
r/gamingnews
We evaluated 112 terms of service: Nintendo had the worst
Posted by u/Neon0asis•07/22/2025
Top Comments
u/According-Stay-3374
Shocker lol.
u/ZoninoDaRat
"Using our state of the art AI Legal Classifier" and I'm already done with the article.
Clickbait going after a target they know the Internet is already riled up about so they can sell thei
u/WhatDidIMakeThis
Idk…. Supervive literally says it tracks EVERYTHING you do on your personal computer… even if the game is closed. Nintendo doesn’t have SHIT on that
u/llliilliliillliillil
That’s impossible. Nintendo is my friend! They would never try to scam me out of my rights!
u/3WayIntersection
Yeah, thats kinda what this sounds like. I have a hard time believing nintendo has *the* single worst TOS out there. Especially when disney and china exist. If they broke top 20, ok, but come
u/TehOwn
>**Particularly egregious terms include:**
>• The obligation to resolve most claims through binding arbitration (though users can technically opt out of this by notifying Nintendo in w