Guided MVP Scoping & Launch Planning Platform
The post discusses the challenge early-stage founders face in defining and scoping their Minimum Viable Product (MVP), leading to varying interpretations of what 'MVP complete' means. This indicates a clear need for structured guidance and tools to prevent scope creep and ensure focused development.
Opportunity: Build a SaaS platform that provides a clear, guided framework for founders and product managers to define, plan, and execute their MVP effectively.
Product Form:
- Interactive MVP Definition Wizard: A step-by-step tool that helps founders articulate their core problem, target users, essential value proposition, and the absolute minimum feature set required for a 'lovable' first version. It could incorporate lean startup principles and common MVP pitfalls.
- Prioritization & Roadmapping: Tools to help prioritize features, differentiate between 'must-haves' and 'nice-to-haves,' and create a clear, actionable roadmap for MVP development.
- Launch Readiness Checklist: A dynamic checklist of non-development tasks crucial for an MVP launch (e.g., basic analytics setup, landing page, user feedback mechanism, simple legal/privacy).
- Templates & Resources: Offer pre-built MVP templates for common SaaS models and curated educational content on MVP best practices, user validation, and lean methodology.
- Key Differentiator: Focus on guided definition and planning specific to MVPs, helping founders avoid overbuilding or under-delivering their initial product.
Expected Revenue: This is a B2B SaaS for startups and product development teams. Founders are often willing to pay for tools that increase their chances of success and save time/money. Priced at $20-$50 per month (per user or team), it can attract a dedicated user base. For example, 1,000 teams at $30/month would generate $30,000/month. The value proposition is clear: reduce risk, accelerate time to market, and build the right MVP.
Origin Reddit Post
r/saas
What’s the bare minimum you consider “MVP complete”?
Posted by u/Specific_Coat3977•07/24/2025
We've been helping a few early-stage founders build out MVPs, and I'm always fascinated by where people draw the line.
Some say it's working auth+ core feature + Stripe.
Others want full
Top Comments
u/Specific_Coat3977
wow
It really reframes the goal
We've seen so many founders overbuild for polish and overlook what users need on Day 1
Have you found any mental model or questions that help founders q
u/Tall-Proof-1705
I work in the games industry and usually we go through alot of milestones to ship a game and I think it translates well in any industry specially tech. The MVP (or vertical slice milestone in
u/Specific_Coat3977
that's the realest signal "strangers come back without chasing them"
we've seen founders get stuck building too much before even testing if people care
Out of curiosity, how do you usuall
u/Specific_Coat3977
Love that take
Clear validation and enough real feedback to shape the next version
u/Life-Fee6501
My cut-off is:
1. users can sign up / log in (email magic link is fine)
2. they can hit **one** end-to-end flow that shows the “aha” value
3. you can take money (Stripe payment link or Paddl
u/Specific_Coat3977
absolutely, expectations have leveled up big time
u/DaedalusSlade
Instead of Minimum Viable Product think about it in terms of Minimum Value Provided. What is the real value that you are providing to your users? I'm betting that the real value is not comi
u/DaedalusSlade
Before you start building anything ask yourself these questions:
1. What is the core problem I am solving?
2. How are target users solving this problem today?
3. What is the quantifiab
u/ILIASS19
Because MVP is designed by you.. But the final product is designed by the final users.
u/kws4679
In the past, just having something that worked was good enough. But now, the SaaS space is so saturated. It's not just about functionality anymore!!!
I think people now expect a decent l
u/andrew19953
Someone not a friend pays...
u/WaleedNas
Great question , I think in 2025, an MVP should *feel* functional, even if it’s not fully polished.
For me, **auth + core functionality + basic UI + feedback loop** is the minimum. Payment (
u/Complete-Onion-4755
Here's some advice from my AI boardroom, I hope it helps.
👨💻 **CTO says:**
**MVP Complete = "One user can do one meaningful thing with minimal help."**
That means:
* ✅ Working core fe
u/davidyu3737
Just delivered a “MVP” in a week. Here’s what I think: MVP is the version that the current company can provide to the customer. My client already had interested customers. A large part of the
u/Specific_Coat3977
Agreed, with tools like LLMs + no-code, threre's no excuse for clunky MVPs anymore
Curious, when you say "do one thing perfectly" are you referring more to functinal execution or nailing th
u/1kgpotatoes
1 core feature working. User can complete what they signed up to achieve to at least 80%
u/Specific_Coat3977
this is fire, super aligned with how we think about lean builds too
What kind of projects have you seen get the most traction with this setup?
u/kws4679
Since building services become extremely easy lately thanks to llm, I think an MVP should at least do one thing perfectly, with a seamless UI.
u/ILIASS19
When you can get clear validation of your idea.. And you have enough user feedback to define the vision of your final product
u/Specific_Coat3977
Love this insight, speed really is underrated when there's already customer interest.
Did you face any trade-offs between speed and polish?
Also, what kind of tools did you stitch togethe
u/DatSwagMario06
MVP complete = working core loop + user validation.
Users need to experience the “aha” moment, and **something is working well enough that strangers come back**. If a handful of real people