Offer corporate consulting on hybrid work strategies and real estate optimization.

Published on 06/11/2025Trend Spotting / Early Adopter Signals

The commentary sheds light on a significant risk in how big tech companies are handling cost-cutting, particularly through voluntary separation packages (VSPs). There's a growing concern that these VSPs might be encouraging high-performing, confident employees—those who can easily find new, well-paying jobs—to leave, while keeping those who may be less skilled or less marketable. This situation presents a substantial business opportunity for:

Specialized HR & Talent Strategy Consulting: A consultancy could help large corporations design and implement "smarter" VSPs or alternative cost-cutting measures to avoid losing top talent. This would involve:

  1. Talent Segmentation Analysis: Helping companies identify critical talent, high-potentials, and those whose departure would be less impactful before rolling out broad VSP offers.
  2. Targeted Incentive Design: Structuring severance or retention bonuses more strategically to achieve the desired outcomes—making packages attractive enough for specific segments while offering strong retention incentives for critical talent.
  3. Impact Modeling: Providing data-driven forecasts on the likely uptake of VSPs across different employee segments and the potential impact on innovation, productivity, and skill gaps.
  4. Change Management & Communication: Assisting companies in effectively communicating these programs to manage morale and perceptions among both departing and remaining employees.

This approach directly addresses the concern that current VSP strategies are suboptimal and could lead to a long-term erosion of valuable expertise within these organizations.

Origin Reddit Post

r/technology

Google continues cost-cutting tactic of throwing cash at employees to leave

Posted by u/Easy-Speech738206/11/2025

Top Comments

u/FreshEclairs
Seems less than optimal
u/bb0110
People tend to over estimate what they can demand though, especially with the job market right now
u/matthra
Maybe, the issue is the job market is awful right now, so you'd have to be pretty sure to take that chance. Probably the safest is to wait it out and see if there is a bottom to the AI labor
u/FreshEclairs
Not on its own, but it does sweeten the pot for a Microsoft or Amazon offer. That said, they probably aren’t offering this to people with good performance ratings.
u/FreshEclairs
My suspicion is that they are more or less blind to the slight productivity increase across the board and sensitive to highly visible underperformance by people who are exploiting the situati
u/EmbarrassedFoot1137
14 weeks + 1 per year of service is hardly enough to push a top achiever to cash in.
u/Warhawk_1
Generally, the data showing productivity up from being remote has never been corroborated with output productivity of a function or team consistently, so it’s viewed as junk in that either in
u/TheLatestTrance
I understand they think that, but all of the data shows otherwise, so I would love to know what they are seeing that the data doesn't? I mean, in tech, you just need internet and you can lite
u/Guer0Guer0
We’re expecting a recession very soon and we have a moron and his sycophants steering the ship for at least the next 3.5 tears, and AI is claiming white collar jobs. I’d hold onto that job fo
u/undersaur
This is how you retain employees who don't think they can get the same pay elsewhere, and lose the ones who can. I mean, not 100%, obviously, as everyone's circumstances differ. But systemic
u/kaishinoske1
I like how Austin will be the home of empty buildings in 2026 because of Google.
u/angry_lib
Funny... a recruiter reached out to me about a job in puget sound. I said if it is any FANG company do not call me. You could hear the rejection as others may be telling him hell no as well.
u/oranguthang87
It’s because they paid out of their asses for these offices. They need people to be there in order to justify that cost.
u/FreshEclairs
They think they get more productivity, on the whole.
u/Idivkemqoxurceke
They kinda have to offer it to everyone. Opens up for lawsuit if they don’t.
u/Disastrous_Bid1564
It’s offered to everyone
u/TheSecondEikonOfFire
That’s my biggest issue. I’d like to get a new job, but I make decent money and the market is just not good. And at the end of the day I’m incredibly fortunate to have the job that I do, so I
u/TheLatestTrance
The only thing I want to know is how is an employee being forced to go into the office somehow cheaper than allowing them to work from home? In concrete terms, that is all I want to know. It
u/sleepydozer
You're thinking of "productivity" too literally as time spent working. The thing about creative work at the very top level is that you can't really innovate without a bunch of great talent ha
u/RingingInTheRain
I don't get why they always want to keep the worst employees just because they accept lower pay. 
u/tiplinix
Depends if you already have an offer lined up but yeah.
u/apetalous42
I worked FinTech for years including investment banking and one of the largest banks in the US. It's all about real estate. The bank I worked for was putting pressure on the businesses they p
u/megrimlockrocks
They need to be more generous such as pay for the rest of the year and RSUs, then I am sure more will take up the opportunity!

Ask AI About This

Get deeper insights about this topic from our AI assistant

Start Chat

Create Your Own

Generate custom insights for your specific needs

Get Started